{"id":102,"date":"2006-11-22T22:44:34","date_gmt":"2006-11-22T20:44:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/?p=102"},"modified":"2006-11-22T22:45:15","modified_gmt":"2006-11-22T20:45:15","slug":"hsn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/hsn\/","title":{"rendered":"HSN"},"content":{"rendered":"
From November 17th till November 18th the HSN-conference took place at our department. HSN (Het Schoolvak Nederlands<\/a>) is a two-day meeting for teachers of mother tongue (Dutch) and literature who have the opportunity to exchange good practices. At this conference the essay \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcDe Cultuur van het Lezen<\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 by Ronald Soetaert was presented and one of the strands was organised around this essay. The essay offers several perspectives on the functions of reading and literature. It doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t want to take a stance pro or contra reading in general or a certain type of literature in particular but wants to look at the continuum on which the debates about these issues are taking place. The essay and the presentation of this essay during the plenary session were filled with citations of novels and quotes from movies. I tried to do the same. <\/p>\n In his novel \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcDe Plaag\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 David van Reybroeck describes the frustration of the scientist Darts who doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t get any acknowledgement for his scientific research in South-Afrika during colonialism (my apologies for the Dutch quote):<\/p>\n \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Ik geloof niet dat Darts\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 gebrek aan erkenning een uitzonder\u00c2\u00aclijk voorbeeld van wetenschappelijke verblinding betrof. Inte\u00c2\u00acgendeel, die episode zegt iets over de scheve verhouding tussen gevestigde geleerden in de metropool en gedreven onderzoekers in de kolonie. Deze laatsten ontbeerden vaak de noodzakelijke geloofsbrieven – iets waar Marais ook mee te kampen had. Wetenschappelijke inzichten veranderen lang niet alleen door ontdekkingen of argumenten, maar minstens zozeer door de sociale netwerken waarin onderzoekers werkzaam zijn. Het zijn die netwerken die bepalen wie geloofwaardig is en wie niet, welke gegevens als betrouwbaar gelden en welke theorie\u00c3\u00abn plausibel zijn. […] De vondst klopte niet, de man klopte niet, de plek klopte niet.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n Van Reybroeck uses the personage of Darts to make clear that the value of science is not only dependent on the research findings and the arguments but is just as much depending on this social network in which the research (so the arguments) are taking place. The value of science is \u00e2\u20ac\u0153situated\u00e2\u20ac\u009d in the context where it is taking place, depending on \u00e2\u20ac\u0153the finding, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153the man\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and \u00e2\u20ac\u0153the place\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (translation of the last sentence of the quote). <\/p>\n In my presentation during the strand \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcDe Cultuur van het Lezen\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 I tried to make a similar point about the science of literature in general and literary criticism in particular, starting from the movie Educating Rita. This film represents very clearly how the (academic) evaluation of literature is based on a few conventions and codes and that being able to talk about literature in an \u00e2\u20ac\u0153appropriate\u00e2\u20ac\u009d manner comes down to knowing and being able to use these codes. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n For instance, Rita (the hair dresser who is taking an Open University course in English literature) is having a discussion with Frank (the cynical professor of literature) about the significance of a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153tragedy\u00e2\u20ac\u009d. According to Frank Macbeth is tragedy, but a car falling on a tree isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t. In one of the next scenes we witness a discussion between Frank and Rita about the value of a critical\/ academic paper: <\/p>\n Frank<\/strong>: In those terms it’s worthless. It shouldn’t be, but it is; in its own terms it’s – it’s wonderful. Rita will not get any acknowledgement with her paper in the world of academic criticism (In those terms its worthless) but Frank tries to show that her text isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t worth less for that reason (In ot\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s own terms it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s wonderful). Rita however wants to learn the academic \u00e2\u20ac\u0153ways with words\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to talk about literature (I wanna write essays like those on there) to be part of the social network where one takes in this way about literature (But don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t you realize I want to change). She want to be part of the literary club. <\/p>\n As teachers we have to be aware of our code and our club. As we want to immerse students in the discourse of literary criticism, then we have to be aware of the kinds of argumentation that count in a certain setting. So, being aware of \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcour\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 and their\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 kinds of argumentation has to be central in out teaching. Precisely in fiction we can see examples that can help us to understand reality better. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" From November 17th till November 18th the HSN-conference took place at our department. HSN (Het Schoolvak Nederlands) is a two-day meeting for teachers of mother tongue (Dutch) and literature who have the opportunity to exchange good practices. At this conference the essay \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcDe Cultuur van het Lezen\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 by Ronald Soetaert was presented and one of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kris.constantvzw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nRita<\/strong>: “It is for the poor bugger under the tree”.<\/p>\n
\nRita<\/strong>: (confronting him across the desk) It’s worthless! You said. An’ if it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s worthless you’ve got to tell me because I wanna write essays like those on there. (She points to the essays on the desk.) I wanna know, an’ pass exams like they do.
\nFrank<\/strong>: But, don’t you see, if you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re going to write this sort of thing – (He indicates the pile of essays.) – to pass examinations, you’re going to have to suppress, perhaps even abandon your uniqueness. I’m going to have to change you.
\nRita<\/strong>: But don’t you realize, I want to change! Listen, is this your way of tellin’ me that I can’t do it? That I’m no good?<\/p>\n